Na actual campanha para o regresso de Passos Coelho, não há quem lhe possa perguntar se está orgulhoso do crescimento da sua criatura, o Ventura?
Aviso aos pacientes: este blogue é antianalgésico, pirético e inflamatório. Em caso de agravamento dos sintomas, escreva aos enfermeiros de plantão.
Apenas para administração interna; o fabricante não se responsabiliza por usos incorrectos deste fármaco.
Apenas para administração interna; o fabricante não se responsabiliza por usos incorrectos deste fármaco.
Passos Coelho: está orgulhoso do crescimento do Ventura, essa sua criatura?
A pergunta não é bem essa. Com Passos Coelho activo, Ventura teria o espaço que tem?
o passos pode tê-lo parido , mas deu-o para adopção ao ps , e é esse que o tem alimentadinho e feito crescer com casos e casinhos . não tivesse o ps seguido a escola socrática e o ventura teria sido um nado morto.
Ó cegonha yo, que andas a fumar??
informações…fumo isso e depois faço círculos com o fumo
diz-me lá , tendo o chega aumentado de um para doze deputados nas legislativas de 22 , e tendo sido fundado em 2019 , o que é que o passos tem a ver com o crescimento desse partido , se o o homem desapareceu entre o nevoeiro -:) em 2015 , há 7/8 anos?
e quem deixou escola no ps -ps que engordou o pequenino cheguinha de um para doze quilos – pois todos os que por lá andam foram seus subordinados e trabalharam as “ordens” dele ( o homem tem uma concepção de poder ultra democrática -:) ) , foi o zezito , que aprendeu com o avô cantigas , o bochechas. o guterres , coitado , foi um erro de casting no meio dessa gente.
Eu quero mesmo é que o aldrabão de Massamá se foda! E do Ventrulhas espero que aproveite aquele tique ridículo da língua que não pára quieta e lambe a beiça três vezes por segundo para lamber os entrefolhos do seu criador. E agora vamos ao verdadeiramente importante. Que tal perder uns minutinhos da semana a ouvir isto?
https://youtu.be/e28xOQYYAWI
Ó burrinha, basta que o putativo líder do PSD, diga preto no branco que não se coliga com os cheganos, e que os jornalistas façam o seu trabalho bem feito e depois veremos a percentagem. Alguma vez perdeste 5 minutos do teu tempo a ouvir os candidatos desse partido??? Foda-se só gente que anda a dormir ou acredita em soluções milagrosas é que vota nessa gente.
oh pah, muito bom!
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html
confesso que nunca o homem, jp, se calhar é porque não acredito em soluções milagrosas vindas de humanos -:)
que nunca ouvi…
teste
Não consigo ler.
Passos Coelho faz muito bem se mandar tudo isto à merda.
a sério, jp?
oh pah, a mim deixa. vais te mijar a rir. olha, vai assim:
Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say
New intelligence reporting amounts to the first significant known lead about who was responsible for the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines that carried natural gas from Russia to Europe.
Adam EntousJulian E. BarnesAdam Goldman
By Adam Entous, Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman
March 7, 2023, 10:26 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON — New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determining responsibility for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigators on both sides of the Atlantic for months.
U.S. officials said that they had no evidence President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine or his top lieutenants were involved in the operation, or that the perpetrators were acting at the direction of any Ukrainian government officials.
The brazen attack on the natural gas pipelines, which link Russia to Western Europe, fueled public speculation about who was to blame, from Moscow to Kyiv and London to Washington, and it has remained one of the most consequential unsolved mysteries of Russia’s year-old war in Ukraine.
Ukraine and its allies have been seen by some officials as having the most logical potential motive to attack the pipelines. They have opposed the project for years, calling it a national security threat because it would allow Russia to sell gas more easily to Europe. Ukrainian government and military intelligence officials say they had no role in the attack and do not know who carried it out.
U.S. officials said there was much they did not know about the perpetrators and their affiliations. The review of newly collected intelligence suggests they were opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation. U.S. officials declined to disclose the nature of the intelligence, how it was obtained or any details of the strength of the evidence it contains. They have said that there are no firm conclusions about it, leaving open the possibility that the operation might have been conducted off the books by a proxy force with connections to the Ukrainian government or its security services.
Some initial U.S. and European speculation centered on possible Russian culpability, especially given its prowess in undersea operations, though it is unclear what motivation the Kremlin would have in sabotaging the pipelines given that they have been an important source of revenue and a means for Moscow to exert influence over Europe. One estimate put the cost of repairing the pipelines starting at about $500 million. U.S. officials say they have not found any evidence of involvement by the Russian government in the attack.
Officials who have reviewed the intelligence said they believed the saboteurs were most likely Ukrainian or Russian nationals, or some combination of the two. U.S. officials said no American or British nationals were involved.
The pipelines were ripped apart by deep sea explosions in September, in what U.S. officials described at the time as an act of sabotage. European officials have publicly said they believe the operation that targeted Nord Stream was probably state sponsored, possibly because of the sophistication with which the perpetrators planted and detonated the explosives on the floor of the Baltic Sea without being detected. U.S. officials have not stated publicly that they believe the operation was sponsored by a state.
The explosives were most likely planted with the help of experienced divers who did not appear to be working for military or intelligence services, U.S. officials who have reviewed the new intelligence said. But it is possible that the perpetrators received specialized government training in the past.
Officials said there were still enormous gaps in what U.S. spy agencies and their European partners knew about what transpired. But officials said it might constitute the first significant lead to emerge from several closely guarded investigations, the conclusions of which could have profound implications for the coalition supporting Ukraine.
Any suggestion of Ukrainian involvement, whether direct or indirect, could upset the delicate relationship between Ukraine and Germany, souring support among a German public that has swallowed high energy prices in the name of solidarity.
U.S. officials who have been briefed on the intelligence are divided about how much weight to put on the new information. All of them spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss classified intelligence and matters of sensitive diplomacy.
U.S. officials said the new intelligence reporting has increased their optimism that American spy agencies and their partners in Europe can find more information, which could allow them to reach a firm conclusion about the perpetrators. It is unclear how long that process will take. American officials recently discussed the intelligence with their European counterparts, who have taken the lead in investigating the attack.
A spokeswoman for the C.I.A. declined to comment. A spokesman for the White House’s National Security Council referred questions about the pipelines to the European authorities, who have been conducting their own investigations.
Any findings that put blame on Kyiv or Ukrainian proxies could prompt a backlash in Europe and make it harder for the West to maintain a united front in support of Ukraine.
U.S. officials and intelligence agencies acknowledge that they have limited visibility into Ukrainian decision-making.
Despite Ukraine’s deep dependence on the United States for military, intelligence and diplomatic support, Ukrainian officials are not always transparent with their American counterparts about their military operations, especially those against Russian targets behind enemy lines. Those operations have frustrated U.S. officials, who believe that they have not measurably improved Ukraine’s position on the battlefield, but have risked alienating European allies and widening the war.
The operations that have unnerved the United States included a strike in early August on Russia’s Saki Air Base on the western coast of Crimea, a truck bombing in October that destroyed part of the Kerch Strait Bridge, which links Russia to Crimea, and drone strikes in December aimed at Russian military bases in Ryazan and Engels, about 300 miles beyond the Ukrainian border.
But there have been other acts of sabotage and violence of more ambiguous provenance that U.S. intelligence agencies have had a harder time attributing to Ukrainian security services.
One of those was a car bomb near Moscow in August that killed Daria Dugina, the daughter of a prominent Russian nationalist.
Kyiv denied any involvement but U.S. intelligence agencies eventually came to believe that the killing was authorized by what officials called “elements” of the Ukrainian government. In response to the finding, the Biden administration privately rebuked the Ukrainians and warned them against taking similar actions.
The explosions that ruptured the Nord Stream pipelines took place five weeks after Ms. Dugina’s killing. After the Nord Stream operation, there was hushed speculation — and worry — in Washington that parts of the Ukrainian government might have been involved in that operation as well.
The new intelligence provided no evidence so far of the Ukrainian government’s complicity in the attack on the pipelines, and U.S. officials say the Biden administration’s level of trust in Mr. Zelensky and his senior national security team has been steadily increasing.
Days after the explosion, Denmark, Sweden and Germany began their own separate investigations into the Nord Stream operation.
Intelligence and law enforcement agencies on both sides of the Atlantic have had difficulty obtaining concrete evidence about what happened on the sea floor in the hours, days and weeks before the explosions.
The pipelines themselves were not closely monitored, by either commercial or government sensors. Moreover, finding the vessel or vessels involved has been complicated by the fact that the explosions took place in a heavily trafficked area.
That said, investigators have many leads to pursue.
According to a European lawmaker briefed late last year by his country’s main foreign intelligence service, investigators have been gathering information about an estimated 45 “ghost ships” whose location transponders were not on or were not working when they passed through the area, possibly to cloak their movements.
The lawmaker was also told that more than 1,000 pounds of “military grade” explosives were used by the perpetrators.
Spokespeople for the Danish government had no immediate comment. Spokespeople for the German government declined to comment.
Mats Ljungqvist, a senior prosecutor leading Sweden’s investigation, told The New York Times late last month that his country’s hunt for the perpetrators was continuing.
“It’s my job to find those who blew up Nord Stream. To help me, I have our country’s Security Service,” Mr. Ljungqvist said. “Do I think it was Russia that blew up Nord Stream? I never thought so. It’s not logical. But as in the case of a murder, you have to be open to all possibilities.”
Reporting was contributed by Rebecca R. Ruiz, Erika Solomon, Melissa Eddy, Michael Schwirtz and Andrew E. Kramer.
Julian E. Barnes is a national security reporter based in Washington, covering the intelligence agencies. Before joining The Times in 2018, he wrote about security matters for The Wall Street Journal. @julianbarnes • Facebook
Adam Goldman reports on the F.B.I. and national security from Washington, D.C., and is a two-time Pulitzer Prize winner. He is the coauthor of “Enemies Within: Inside the NYPD’s Secret Spying Unit and bin Laden’s Final Plot Against America.” @adamgoldmanNYT
O artigo do NYT poderá eventualmente significar que os américas se estão a preparar para entregar Herr Zelensky von Pandora Papers aos bichos.
camacho,
eu considero-o um teste (no pun intended) aos que acham que os usa até mentiram no iraque mas neste conflito estão a dizer a verdade. quer dizer, só nos pede para acreditar que uns gajos quaisquer mergulharam num triangulo de países NATO e destruíram uma infraestrutura critica de um desses países NATO (não sei se já disse que isto foi um ataque a um país NATO, já?), sem que ninguém se apercebesse disso, nomeadamente a NATO. aguardo ansiosamente a noticia de que os X-Men ou os Vingadores estão envolvidos no conflito.
A probabilidade disso acontecer é mais ou menos a mesma de perguntarem ao Costa se tem orgulho em ajudar a armar e financiar o batalhão azov e o sector direito. A máquina de propaganda que protege um e o outro é a mesma, os jornalistas são os mesmos, as motivações também. De que te queixas?
Teste, é isso que dizes mas é também o que digo. O palhaço corrupto cumpriu o papel que lhe foi atribuído, mas começa a tornar-de um embaraço e está na hora de sair de cena. Pode fazê-lo a bem, e ir gozar do pecúlio acumulado num dos apartamentos de Londres, Nova Iorque ou Riviera, eu fazê-lo a mal, e levar com uma aspirina de chumbo no meio da testa, cortesia de azoves e afins.
já agora , jp , o frankenstein chega , feito com bocados do cds e do psd e , quem sabe , com muitos desiludidos com a esquerda caviar, ganhou vida própria. estarem aqui a preocupar-se sobre quem o fez é perda de tempo. têm de ver o que o fez crescer e corrigi-lo. e corrigi-lo passa por quem está na política servir o povo e não servir os seus próprios interesses e de quem lhe pode trazer benefícios. se a situação do pais e das pessoas fosse boa , achas que o chega tinha crescido? não achas estranho que bancos , elétcricas , grandes empresas tenham lucros nunca vistos e que as pessoas não tenham dinheiro para terem uma vida confortável apesar de trabalharem, numa governação dita socialista? eu acho. parece evidente para quem os socialistas trabalham. para os mesmos que trabalha o psd.
mas o que está a acontecer aconteceu mil vezes ao longo da história , o meu autor de bolso , Maquiavel , descreveu-o muito bem: quando a ganância fica à solta , uma ditadura surge no horizonte.
se calhar pensam que podem ordenhar o povo infinitamente sem que ele reaja. as tetas precisam de descanso…
porque somos nós que fazemos tudo , somos nós que criamos riqueza , os do trabalho manual. um arquiteto sem pedreiros é nada , um pedreiro sem arquiteto pode fazer uma casa. topas?
substituam ” o povo é quem mais é ordenhado” por ” povo é quem mais ordena ” e acaba-se o chega.
por exemplo , a forma coo os merceeiros sobem os preços : as pessoas, coitadas, procuram o mais barato , descobrem um produto alimentar mais barato que satisfaz as suas necessidades , começam a comprar o mais barato , os mais caros ficam nas prateleiras. passado um tempo , não muito , esse produto mais barato e mais comprado sobe de preço , uns 15% ou mais. e sobe não porque os custos da matéria prima ou produção tenham subido , sobe porque querem recuperar as perdas da diminuição de vendas do mais caro. e isto é permitido? está mal.
não há fixação de margem de lucro , como fizeram com as máscaras e gel , por ? a comida é bem mais importante.